I am unhappy with an article I read in the published by the “West Australian Times” today. “Mother left quadriplegic after migraine treatment” (link below) makes for a nice public interest piece. It focuses solely on the what a horrible decision it was to receive the spinal intervention treatment. She claims the doctor never told her paralysis was a possible side-effect. Why did she not think to research the procedure on her own or ask if headache was the worse possible side-effect? Headache and nausea the worse possible side-effect? Please, the doctor probably said the most common. At least read the consent form. That is not there just to cover their buts, it informs you of the worse outcomes. The article could have at least said “chronic migraine.” I doubt the doctor would have recommended this to someone that was managing alright with medicine.
Then there is no words of defense on her part. Why did you choose to do this in the first place? She just says she should have never done it. Anyone with no experience is already thinking “that idiot, it just a headache.” She should have defended herself. I chose to do this because. It’s crap that this happened. I wish I had properly educated myself before going into a surgery that was messing with my neurological system. It just seems like common sense. But instead made all of us look like desperate idiots who don’t care of the consequences until its to late and then push off the blame and throw ourselves on the mercy of others.
And then she didn’t say if the treatment worked. My exact thought upon reading the title was “yeah, but did it work?” (awful I know). That is why I read the article, hoping it would add that tidbit. But no, of course not. Wouldn’t want to tempt the irrational drug seeking idiots.
Another article to feed into the stereo-types. Attention hungry, drug seeking, and pathetic. Thank you media. We really needed that.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/30609749/mother-left-quadriplegic-after-migraine-treatment/